Skip to main content

Technical authority behind water recovery and POCS studies.

About

Prof. André Leone Riguetti is a technical partner associated with Quantum’s discussions on water resources, environmental quality, sanitation, and advanced oxidation technologies. His trajectory connects academic activity, environmental management, water quality monitoring, and applied technical studies focused on the recovery and protection of aquatic systems.

His background reinforces the importance of combining technology, operational monitoring, regulatory awareness, and environmental responsibility in projects involving rivers, reservoirs, lakes, and water treatment systems.

Institutional Recognition

Moção de Aplausos e Congratulações - ALERJ

The Moção de Aplausos e Congratulações recognizes André Leone Riguetti’s professional trajectory and contributions related to environmental management, water quality, sustainability, and water resources in Rio de Janeiro.

View recognition document

Articles and Technical Production

Requalification of the Maracanã River using Chlorine and Silicon Polyoxide (POCS)

Original Portuguese title: Requalificação do Rio Maracanã com o uso do Polióxido de Cloro e Silício (POCS)

Event
26º ENCOB - Encontro Nacional de Comitês de Bacias Hidrográficas
Location/date
Vitória, September 8-13, 2025
Modality
Scientific Article
Thematic area
Environmental monitoring / water resources
Authors
André Leone Riguetti, Anna Paula Bourdon, Juan Felippe Santiago de Vasconcellos, Bruno Pereira, Gabriela Pacheco, and Sara Candido

Comparative analysis of chemical oxidation technologies using POCS and River Treatment Units for river revitalization

Original Portuguese title: Análise comparativa das tecnologias de oxidação química pelo Polióxido de Cloro e Silício (POCS) e a Unidade de Tratamento de Rios (UTR) visando a revitalização de rios

Event
XII ECOB-RJ - Encontro Estadual de Comitês de Bacias Hidrográficas do Rio de Janeiro
Location/date
Miguel Pereira, RJ, April 13-16, 2026
Modality
Article
Thematic area
Sanitation
Authors
André Leone Riguetti, Anna Paula Bourdon, Juan Felippe Santiago de Vasconcellos, Vinicius D’eça, Maryana Larissa Inacio de Claudino, and Emanuele Cosendey Albuquerque

COMPARATIVO ENTRE POCS E OXIDANTES COMUNS

POCS vs Common Oxidants

A complete comparison between oxidant technologies should go beyond the nominal purchase cost of chemical inputs. Technical and economic evaluation should also consider useful oxidative efficiency, specific consumption, operating stability, formation of byproducts, regulatory requirements, safety infrastructure, environmental externalities, and total system cost.

This section summarizes the technical note provided for this project. Performance depends on water matrix, operating conditions, dosage, monitoring, and treatment objectives.

Comparison of conventional oxidants and POCS by technical criterion
CriterionConventional oxidants, such as chlorine gas and sodium hypochloritePOCS
Predominant mechanismHalogenation and partial oxidation.Direct oxidation by electron transfer, according to the technical note.
Useful oxidative efficiencyMay be reduced by side reactions with organic matter, nitrogen compounds, and other constituents.Technical note indicates higher use of the applied oxidative potential in appropriate applications.
Specific consumptionMay require higher dosage in complex matrices or when side reactions consume oxidant.Technical note indicates the possibility of lower operational dosage in certain applications.
pH dependenceHigher sensitivity to pH and water chemistry.Technical note indicates greater stability across different operating conditions.
Byproduct formationCan form disinfection byproducts such as THMs, HAAs, chloramines, and other organochlorinated compounds.Technical note indicates significant mitigation of organochlorinated byproduct formation under appropriate operating conditions.
Corrosivity and asset impactCan contribute to corrosion and accelerated wear of equipment and infrastructure.Technical note indicates reduced operational impact on assets.
Operational safetyHigher complexity, especially where chlorine gas storage, containment, and contingency systems are required.Technical note indicates lower safety and handling complexity.
System-level economicsDirect chemical cost may not reflect indirect costs related to safety, maintenance, monitoring, and compliance.Technical note indicates a potentially better balance between performance, safety, and total system cost.

Efficiency beyond chemical price

Reduced operational complexity

Lower byproduct concern

More stable performance

System-level economic evaluation

Alignment with water security goals